|
Home / Articles
/ Training
/ Getting The Most Out Of Your
Cardio?
Cardio Progressions
Are you getting the most out of your cardio
training?
By Dr. John
M Berardi, Ph.D.
First published at www.t-nation.com, June 6, 2006.
Printer
friendly version
The last time it happened I was getting changed in the locker room
at my gym. Two pudgy-bellied gym members (PBGMs) were discussing the
relative virtues and drawbacks of doing cardio as part of their training
program.
PBGM #1: Man, I've gotta get my ass in shape for the summer. This
gut has got to go!
PBGM #2: Yeah, I hear ya. I'm about to start doing cardio three or
four times a week for 30 minutes. That should help me burn the fat.
PBGM #1: Cardio?! Haven't you heard that cardio isn't any good for
fat loss? I read this one article suggesting cardio only makes you
fatter by causing the body to store more fat... or something like
that. To lean out, you need to do something called HIIT: High Intensity
Interval Training.
PBGM #2: Come on now, cardio makes you fat? I doubt that. I heard
that you burn more fat during low intensity exercise vs. high intensity
exercise. And that's exactly what I'm looking for. I gotta get rid
of this fat!
PBGM #1: No way man, regular cardio is garbage. Go ahead and waste
your time if you want. I'll be doing HIIT instead. It burns way more
fat, plus I read about this one workout that only lasts 10 to 12 minutes.
That's what I'm talking about.
PBGM #2: Alright, how about this: You do your workout three times
per week and I'll do mine three times per week and we'll see who gets
leaner first!
Ugh. Another HIIT vs. low intensity cardio debate. Great. Now, on the
outside, I was just getting changed and minding my own business. But
on the inside, I was losing IQ points just listening to these two talk
about losing their guts. That's when, disturbingly, they turned to me.
PBGM #2: So what do you think? You're in great shape. Who's gonna
lose body fat the fastest?
Me: Uh... ah...
PBGM #2: Go ahead; tell him that you can't possibly get lean in 10
to 12 minutes!
Me: Right, well, guys, I've gotta go. Let me know how your challenge
works out.
This low intensity vs. high intensity cardio debate is getting outta
hand! So out of hand in fact that fat guys worldwide, fat guys who aren't
doing anything right, are debating about the "perfect way"
to expend energy and lose fat. What a stupid debate to be having when
you're 30 pounds over-fat!
And the same goes for the second most frequent cardio debate. Can you
guess what debate that is? If you guessed the fasted vs. non-fasted
cardio debate, give yourself a gold star.
Don't get me wrong, there are relative merits to having these discussions
for certain individuals at certain levels of development. In fact, myself,
Dave Barr, Christian Thibaudeau, and Dr. Lonnie Lowery had a discussion
about these very topics. (Check out the Fasted Cardio Roundtable for
more.)
Unfortunately, amid all these debates, there's one cardio question
that's being asked way too infrequently: What type of cardio progression
are you using? You know, progression: how you're increasing the work
you do from one cardio session to the next in order to ensure that you
continue to improve your fitness and lose body fat.
Still confused? Well, let's take a look at the ways that exercisers
increase their weight training demands from week-to-week in order to
increase their probabilities of positive progress. Maybe that'll give
ya some clues.
Weight Training Progressions
In our weight training arsenals there are several ways to design programs
to ensure progress toward a variety of goals, including increased strength,
increased power, increased muscle mass, etc. Here are a few examples
of ways to design a progression:
#1 Simple Load Progression
Classic progressive resistance training (or simple load progression
as I call it) relies on the necessity of increasing our load lifted
over time, assuming the same repetition range.
Like Milo, the Greek wrestler who purportedly jogged around the perimeter
of the Coliseum with a calf on his back, getting stronger and stronger
as the calf slowly grew into a bull, we try to increase the weight lifted
from one week to the next in order to continue to progress.
#2 Complex Load Progression
Periodization models have introduced the idea of systematically increasing
our load lifted while decreasing our repetitions. This model uses gradually
increasing loads (or intensities, defined as a percentage of 1 rep max)
while using gradually decreasing volume (measured by the total number
of repetitions performed during a workout). These types of sessions
are called intensificationsessions.
Of course, even within an overall periodized program that's focusing
on intensification (heavier loads and fewer reps during a workout),
the idea of simple load progression still stands. Obviously, if you're
using a similar repetition range from week to week during an intensification
phase, you should be increasing your load used, even if you're only
using the same rep range during two consecutive training sessions for
that movement.
#3 Simple Volume Progression
Compared to the simple load progression above, simple volume progression
is pretty much the opposite. Instead of increasing the load from week
to week, you keep the load the same while increasing the volume (measured
by the total number of repetitions performed during a workout, whether
that's adding a few reps to each set or adding a few total sets).
So, instead of doing 6 reps at 200lbs, as you did during week one,
you'd be doing 7 reps at 200lbs during week two. Alternatively, instead
of doing 3 sets of 6 reps at 200lbs, you might do 4 sets of 6 reps at
200lbs. Either way, volume progresses, load stays the same.
#4 Complex Volume Progression
Converse to the complex load progression above, complex volume progression
is also pretty much the opposite. Instead of progressively increasing
load lifted while decreasing the number of repetitions (intensification),
you'd increase the volume (number of repetitions and/or sets) while
decreasing the intensity (measured as a percentage of 1RM, otherwise
known as load). This is commonly called accumulation.
#5 Other Progression Methods
These are just a few of the progression methods out there that vary
load and volume systematically in order to stimulate progress. And,
of course, when the time factors are introduced (time between sets,
total workout duration, etc.), we have another set of variables ripe
for manipulation.
Some examples include decreasing rest time from week to week in order
to improve between-set recovery. Another variation of this theme is
to increase rest time from week to week in order to handle heavier loads
on subsequent sets. Depending on your goals, both can be viable methods
of progression.
Another example of using time as a variable is Charles Staley's EDT.
This style of training demands that, from one week to the next, you
increase the number of reps you perform while keeping the total exercise
time constant.
Cardio Progressions
So now that we've reviewed some of the possible weight training progressions,
got any ideas on how to progress your cardio work in order to best stimulate
progress and prevent stagnation? Let's discuss some of the variables
available to you, whether your goals are improving overall fitness,
improving your aerobic and/or anaerobic conditioning, and/or losing
body fat.
#1 Volume Progression for Cardio
Volume progression is the most commonly used method with recreational
exercisers. Time to get lean? Well then, it's time to start walking,
jogging, or riding bike a few times a week.
Results stagnating? Time to do more. That is, if they actually bother
to do more at all. There are still a lot of folks that sit back and
bitch about how they're doing their X, Y, or Z minutes of cardio and
aren't getting any leaner without ever considering that a progression
may be necessary, just like with weight training.
What worked for the first few weeks might not exactly work for the
next few. And if those X, Y, or Z minutes continue to work for 12 weeks,
perhaps there was some element of overkill in the early weeks. You see,
that same individual may have only needed X-60 minutes during the first
few weeks, X-30 minutes during the next few weeks, and X minutes only
during the last few weeks. And this isn't just about wasted time —
it could mean wasted muscle if you're doing much more cardio than you
need.
So make sure you at least consider the possibility of using a cardio
volume progression rather than either just picking an arbitrary amount
and sticking with it in spite of no progress or going overboard and
doing a ton in the early phases when not necessary.
Here's an example of what your cardio volume progression might look
like:
Weeks 1 and 2 — 60 total minutes
(1 x 60 minutes or 2 x 30 minutes or 3 x 20 minutes)
Weeks 3 and 4 — 90 total minutes
(2 x 45 minutes or 3 x 30 minutes or 4 x 22.5 minutes)
Week 5 and 6 — 120 total minutes
(2 x 60 minutes or 3 x 40 minutes or 4 x 30 minutes)
Weeks 7 and 8 — 150 total minutes
(3 x 50 minutes or 4 x 37.5 minutes or 5 x 30 minutes)
Note: Keep in mind that progression is dictated by results —
if you're losing too fast or starting to feel run-down, slow down the
progression. If you're not losing fast enough or not adapting as quickly,
speed up the progression.
So what if you're doing HIIT? Does the same type of volume progression
work? Of course it does.
In the end, the point here isn't necessarily to follow exactly what
I've laid out above or to suggest that volume progression is the only
way to schedule your cardio sessions. The point is that you shouldn't
just lock into one baseline set of volume parameters and stick with
them. Just like with weight training, if you want to progress in the
fitness and/or fat loss departments, you'll need to use some sort of
cardio progression too.
#2 Intensity Progression for Cardio
So what if you've used a volume progression and simply can't afford
any more time? Or what if you just want to use an intensity progression
instead of a volume progression? Or what if you want a combination of
both?
Well, let's start with intensity progression alone. Rather than increasing
the number of minutes spent exercising, when targeting intensity progression
you'd increase the average intensity of those same minutes.
In this case, during steady state cardio, you'll want to gradually
increase the intensity of your efforts by speeding up. For example,
if you're getting comfortable biking three times a week for 30 minutes
at level 5 on the stationary bike, you can pick up the intensity of
your ride by increasing the level to 6. And, as discussed above, the
progression should be systematic. Here's an example:
Week 1 — 3 x 30 minutes at level 5
Week 2 — 3 x 30 minutes at level 6
Week 3 — 3 x 30 minutes at level 7
Week 4 — 3 x 30 minutes at level 8
Note: Again, progression is dictated by results — if you're losing
too fast or starting to feel run-down, slow down the progression. If
you're not losing fast enough or not adapting as quickly, speed up the
progression.
And don't be afraid to mix progression techniques. If, during week
3 you can't get 3 x 30 minutes at level 7, perhaps starting at 3 x 20
minutes at level 7 and working your way up to 3 x 30 minutes at this
level is the best strategy.
And, again, does this work for HIIT training? Can you use these intensity
progressions for this type of cardio? Yes again!
With HIIT you can increase the mean intensity of your workouts one
of two ways. First, you can keep your work-to-rest ratios the same and
boost the intensity of the work interval. Secondly, you can reduce your
rest interval while keeping your work interval at the same intensity.
Either way, your average intensity for the session will be higher and
you'll be using a cardio progression to ensure steady results.
#3 Load Progression for Cardio
Another relatively unheralded way of progressing is to increase your
cardio load. Cardio load? Yep, that's the amount of weight you're carrying
around when you're doing weight-bearing cardio.
I use an X-vest (a weighted vest) for this purpose. To use a load progression
for cardio, you'd simply add small amounts of weight to the vest over
time while walking, stair-climbing, etc. in order to provide more total
resistance. This is the whole Milo thing discussed above.
This strategy is especially useful during periods of weight loss. Technically,
rather than actually loading your cardio, you're actually replacing
the load that you've lost. And this is a huge asset as the same amount
of cardio, once you've lost weight, is much less effective.
After all, 30 minutes of walking done four times per week at 200 pounds
is more calorie-costly vs. 30 minutes of walking done four times per
week at 185 dieted-down pounds. So why not walk at 200 pounds for a
few weeks, then 210 pounds, and so on — regardless of how much
body weight you're carrying?
(Interestingly, the same goes for body weight exercises when losing
weight — unweighted chins at 185 pounds are much less of a challenge
than unweighted chins at 200 pounds.)
Be careful with high-impact activities, however. You don't want to
tear up your joints with heavy loads strapped to you during activities
like running. Also, athletes shouldn't use this type of load progression
during most agility drills or top-end speed work as they're likely to
teach themselves to be slower.
And again, rather than using the example above as gospel, the point
here is that you can alter your cardio load just like you can alter
your cardio intensity and duration.
Wrap-Up
Hopefully you're now wise to a variety of parameters you can alter
to make your cardio work more effective, whether you're looking for
increased fitness or better fat loss. Just like weight trainers regularly
use progressions with their lifting, in many cases, they should be doing
the same for their cardio work.
So, if your fat loss efforts just aren't what you expected them to
be, give some of these cardio progression strategies a try.
|