|
Home / Articles
/ Q
& A
/ Gang
of Five - May 2001
Gang of Five
May 2001
By Dr. John M Berardi, Ph.D.
First published at www.t-mag.com
Printer
friendly version
I'm just a simple man . . .
Q. I read a recommendation in Flex that the perfect post-workout shake
would be made up of whey protein and dextrose. I've been using maltodextrin
as the carb for years for mine, thinking simple sugars had no business
in my supplements. What's your opinion on simple sugars after training?
A. Anyone who is familiar with my writings knows that the perfect
post-workout shake is NOT made up of regular whey plus dextrose. Rather,
the perfect post-workout shake would consist of a blend of whey hydrolysates,
maltodextrin, dextrose, and various amino acids including glutamine, phenylalanine,
and BCAA. To refresh your memory as to why, go and read (or re-read) my
two-part Solving the Post-Workout Puzzle article.
Since your question revolves around the carbohydrate source in this mixture
and this is something I didn't spend a lot of time on in my article, I
will address this now. First of all, with respect to post-workout carbohydrates,
your goal should be to rapidly re-hydrate the body as well as rapidly
replenish glycogen stores. The best way to do this is by consuming a high
glycemic index carbohydrate source. High glycemic carbs are very rapidly
digested and absorbed into the blood.
Interestingly, as most people now know, the distinction between simple
(single sugar units) and more complex carbs (longer chains of sugar units)
doesn't tell us much about the glycemic index. In fact, the dextrose and
maltodextrin comparison is a good example of this. Dextrose is a simple
carb consisting of single glucose units in solution. It is very sweet
tasting. Maltodexrin, on the other hand, is a complex carb consisting
of between 3-20 glucose units joined together. It has very little taste.
While there are some striking differences between these carb sources in
terms of structure and metabolic processing once inside the body, their
glycemic indices are both quite high.
To take advantage of their similarities as well as their differences,
the ideal post-workout carbohydrate source should be a 50-50 combo of
the two. You see, maltodextrin is less likely to cause GI distress due
to the low osmolarity (the amount of free glucose units in a given amount
of liquid). This property also means that it will be more quickly absorbed.
The more free glucose molecules in solution, the slower the GI absorption
times. So since malto has less free units per quantity of liquid, it is
more rapidly absorbed. Finally malto seems to replenish glycogen stores
better than other carbohydrates. So it's a must for the post workout drink.
However, don't sell out dextrose just yet. Since free glucose units can
actually facilitate fluid uptake and absorption in the GI due to an active
coupled glucose-sodium transporter, dextrose is a good addition to the
drink as well.
In the end, I hope it's clear that a combo of malto and dextrose is ideal
for the post-workout drink and that in the post-workout situation, the
difference between "simple" and a "complex" carbs
is unimportant. Your main goal at this time is to get rapidly absorbed
carbs and protein into the blood as fast as you can.
Hoop Dreams
Q. I am a 15-year-old who is trying my best to earn a scholarship
for basketball. Are there any supplements that could send my height bursting
through the roof? I was thinking of using a GH-releaser or maybe even
getting some real GH.
A. I know how important athletics are to you since I've been a competitive
athlete all my life. But I want you to realize that the risks of trying
to boost your height with growth hormone FAR outweigh the unlikely benefits.
For a review of GH itself, go back and read my "Fountain of GH"
article. In it you will find that while GH use at your age might marginally
increase your height (it is debatable though), it is more likely to increase
the size of your organs, lead to the temporary destruction of your joints,
and could lead to enlarged hands and jaw (a condition known as acromegaly).
In addition, although GH may increase muscle mass, the new muscle seems
to have poor strength ability relative to its size. So although you might
be a bit taller, your muscles may not perform properly, your organs may
fail early, and your joints may be a limiting factor in your performance.
I may be wrong, but none of these side effects will lead to a career of
basketball greatness. The several hundred dollars per week that you will
have to spend on GH is probably something that might present a challenge
as well.
As far as supplements, the "GH-boosters" have been sadly disappointing.
The ones that have been studied have been shown to be completely ineffective.
And the ones that are being promoted as super-effective have absolutely
no data to support them. So GH releasers will probably just be a waste
of money for you.
My advice at this point is to just keep training with weights, plyometrics,
and cardiovascular conditioning. This will put you light years ahead of
your peers. Trust me on this one. And you just might have a growth spurt
coming on that will boost you up higher than you had expected.
|