|        
|
|
Home / Articles
/ Hormones
/ Steroid Manifesto Part 3
Steroid Manifesto Part 3
Everything your mamma never told you
about steroids
By Dr. John M Berardi, Ph.D. and
Kris Aiken
First published at www.t-mag.com, Feb 7 2003.
Printer
friendly version
As you might imagine, almost every secret, or even not-so-secret club,
gang, pack, or gaggle has a manifesto, a document detailing all the important
information that every devotee should possess. The Christian club has
the Bible, the US gang has got the Constitution and the Bill of Rights,
and even that Bill Phillips, Body For Life pack has a glossy, estrogen-
soaked manual that describes how to place your lips directly onto Bill
Phillips' butt while sliding your hard earned dollars into the front pockets
of his freshly pressed chinos.
This makes me wonder what the world would be like if there were a Book
of T, The Word of Testosterone, if you will? Perhaps a book like this
might, in some small way, negate the damage caused by years of indelibly
stamped images of Richard Simmons's flabby thighs in spandex. Perhaps
it might also help erase years of erroneous fitness mythology from the
memory centers of fitness trainers and exercisers alike.
If such a book were to be written, I might expect that every full-fledged,
card-carrying member of T-Nation would have a copy and this holy book
would provide information essential to all T-Nation members. Hence this
hypothetical introductory chapter, my vision of what the members of Testosterone
Nation should know about their namesake.
Part 1 of this three-part
series discussed steroid fundamentals, while part
2 discussed how they're used. This final installment addresses the
legal concerns.
Legal, Illegal, Am I Going To Jail?
Since steroids are often sold in locker rooms around the country without
a second thought and since the status of steroids has changed over the
years, many individuals have no idea as to the true legal status of the
drugs or the implications of being caught dispensing or possessing them.
If you're gonna play the game, at least know the rules.
Before 1988, steroids were classified as mere prescription drugs by
the FDA (Food and Drug Administration). The job of the FDA is to determine
which drugs will be classisified as over-the-counter and which will be
available only through prescription. In addition, during this time, the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, an act designed to restrict the
access of certain drugs to those with "legitimate" medical uses
(i.e. with a prescription) by categorizing drugs, determined that steroids
could only be distributed with a prescription.
Importantly though, at this time, steroids were not classified as "controlled
substances" by the Controlled Substances Act. "Controlled substances"
are substances that are more tightly regulated than "uncontrolled"
prescription drugs. With tighter control comes a longer paper trail, more
intense scrutiny of doctors prescribing these drugs, and more severe penalties
associated with illegal dispensation and use.
By the early 80's, due to more frequent reports of steroid use in athletes,
especially young athletes, policy makers began to discuss elevating steroids
to "controlled" status. Finally, in 1988, the Anti-Drug Abuse
Act was passed, putting steroids in a special prescription category, one
that carried severe legal penalties for illegal sale or possession with
intent to distribute. Remember, before 1988 steroids had always been illegal
to sell or possess without a prescription. This new act simply added a
very real threat of serious legal penalty (making it a felony, in fact).
Contrary to their attempts to reduce steroid use via legislation, steroid
use only accelerated in years following the passage of this act. In response,
Congress decided to go ahead and add steroids to the Controlled Substances
Act as an amendment (Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 1990), making steroid
possession, possession with intent to distribute, and distribution serious
offences with penalties similar to those associated with morphine and
other scheduled substances.
Interestingly, the transcripts from the Congressional hearings were
clear in indicating that health concerns were not the main reason for
making steroids controlled substances despite the fact that nearly every
other controlled drug was on that list because of associated (and sometimes
severe) health risks and dependency. Instead, Congress decided to control
these drugs in response to the cries of athletic organizations and in
response to a desire to limit adolescent use. Sure, the health risks were
considered. But they were not the main motive or force for scheduling
these drugs as "controlled." While there are several categories
of controlled substances ("schedules"), steroids are placed
in Schedule III, along with amphetamines, methamphetamines, opium, and
morphine. Buying, possessing, and selling steroids, nowadays, is legally
equivalent to buying opium and morphine.
Confused yet? If so, let me break it down. In 1990 steroids were vaulted
to an extreme category of highly specialized prescription drugs, drugs
that are more difficult to prescribe or obtain, drugs that carry severe
penalties for their illegal possession, use, and distribution. This, of
course, occurred on a federal level. To add more confusion to the issue,
state laws vary with respect to steroid classification and the severity
of penalties. All of this legislation, interestingly, occurred without
the support of the American Medical Association, the FDA, the DEA, and
the National Institute on Drug Abuse! All of these expert agencies actually
testified, sometimes vehemently, against the federal and state legislation.
In direct response to the changes in steroid law, many individuals,
from big-time black market steroid traffickers to small-time steroid users,
have served significant prison sentences for their unlawfulness. Nevertheless,
it's clear that these laws have not reduced steroid use in the general
public or in athletics, which was their original intent. In addition,
with respect to health issues, many believe that the Anabolic Steroid
Control Act, rather than protecting the public, created the two biggest
health problems associated with steroid use: counterfeit drugs and improper
medical supervision.
Understand that regardless of whether on not drug laws are right or
wrong, they are still on the books and we are all subject to them. If
you choose to use steroids without a prescription, you are choosing to
defy the law. In choosing to defy the law, you're accepting the risk of
getting caught, serving time in prison, and/or paying some hefty fines
and lawyer fees.
I'm An Athlete — What Do I Have To Know?
Whether this is an appropriate view or not, athletics have historically
been seen as an endeavor that promotes health and well-being as well as
the idea of fair play. Therefore, an embarrassing hypocrisy is present
when drug use is rampant at the highest levels of athletics (pro and Olympic
level sport).
In an effort to prevent the "tarnishing" of a long-standing
athletic ideology, sport-governing bodies, historically, have attempted
a two-tiered approach: lobby Congress for more severe drug regulations,
and implement mandatory drug testing of athletes. Arguably, neither has
produced the desired effect. At the same time though, abandonment of these
policies would be an admission of defeat; indirectly condone drug use;
and allow athletes who are more pharmaceutically daring to gain a competitive
edge over those more conservative athletes. Therefore, governing bodies
have remained steadfast in their commitment to their testing programs.
Drug testing in sport began in the late 1950's. However, the first testing
for steroids was implemented during the 1976 Montreal Olympic Games after
the creation of specific screening procedures (RIA — radioimmunoassay,
and GCMS — gas chromatography — mass spectrometry). At this
time, the testing consisted of analyzing urine samples (the only permitted
testing fluid) using RIA for exogenous steroids. If they were found in
urine, GCMS was used to confirm the results. Since this type of testing
lacked specificity and since this method could not distinguish between
endogenous and exogenous Testosterone, new methods were required.
Later, in 1984, GCMS was used as the main method of analysis. This method
could test for more specific steroid metabolites as well as testing the
Testosterone to epitestosterone ratio (T/E). This latter method could
distinguish whether a person was on Testosterone because endogenous Testosterone
is produced in the testis in a 1:1 ratio with epitestosterone. Therefore,
if someone were on exogenous Testosterone, this ratio would be out of
balance. Due to some natural variations in this ratio it was established
that a 6:1 ratio of T/E determined suspicion while a 10:1 ratio established
guilt.
This method of testing, however, could be overcome by a variety of methods:
- Simply co-administering a cocktail of Testosterone and epitestosterone
to maintain the appropriate ratio. This cocktail would also contain
other appropriate endogenous steroids since the administration of only
T and e would inappropriately elevate these two hormones relative to
the other endogenous steroids, thereby raising caution flags. On the
other hand, the co-administration of Testosterone and epitestosterone
alone, if done in smaller doses, might not be cause for suspicion.
- The use of Testosterone patches or gels. These drugs have a slower
release and deliver steroids in such a way as to lower peak blood concentration,
perhaps allowing athletes to still pass using the 6:1 ratio as the standard.
However this use, due to 5 alpha reductase activity in the skin, can
lead to elevated blood DHT and the DHT may be detected in the urine.
- Having a good lawyer. The T/E ratio is flawed due to the fact that
very little is known about individual variation based on diet, gender,
training, etc. In addition, there are several scenarios that will raise
the T/E ratio without the accused actually taking Tstosterone. As a
result, several cases have been thrown out due to inconclusive evidence
that drugs were used.
Since there are serious problems with the T/E ratio for detecting steroid
use (the current method), a new technique is being proposed for use. This
technique uses IRMS (isotope ratio mass spectrometry) to distinguish exogenous
Testosterone from endogenous Testosterone. Since Testosterone is made
up of carbon atoms and different carbon atoms have different weights,
IRMS can figure out how many of the lighter carbons (C12) and how many
of the heavy carbons (C13) are around.
Endogenous Testosterone (naturally produced) is made up of 98.9% C12
and 1.1% C13. If any Testosterone shows up in the urine that doesn't contain
these percentages, it's suspected that the person is using exogenous Testosterone.
In addition, Testosterone and other steroids can be used without penalty
by:
- The use of masking agents (drugs designed to mask the metabolites
of certain steroids) and/or specially formulated drugs that are not
currently detectable.
- Monitoring by, what some call, "rogue labs." Many athletes
will have their blood and urine monitored regularly in order to ensure
that the drugs they are using are not detectible.
As you can see, the drug testing procedures are becoming increasingly
more complex in an attempt to keep pace with new drugs and new techniques
designed to beat the current tests. Unfortunately, with this complexity
comes exponential growth in the expenses associated with testing. Off-season
testing can cost up to $1000 per sample. In addition, in competition testing
can cost upwards of several million dollars for an event like the Olympic
games. Finally, it costs millions of dollars to fund research to keep
ahead of drug users. As a result, some experts believe that testing methods
are destined to fail.
However, regardless of the outcome, athletes are faced with the choice
of avoiding steroids and risking victory or using steroids and risking
detection. To the average athlete without advanced drug use and masking
techniques, there's a good chance of getting caught.
Of course, the intensity of these efforts is directed at Olympic and
international level athletes. Professional sport tends to treat drug use
much differently and therefore avoids much of the controversy associated
with Olympic sport.
Summing It All Up
This three-part introduction to steroids has attempted to provide an
overview of the T-Nation's namesake by discussing steroid definitions,
chemical structures, a brief history of steroids, an overview of how steroids
were introduced to sport (part
I). In addition, we've provided a brief introduction to modes of steroid
delivery, how steroids work, and side effects (both good and bad) (part
II). Finally, we've provided some information about legal issues and
testing in sport.
While this three part series has contained quite a bit of steroid information,
it's barely scratched the surface of steroid knowledge. For more detailed
information about steroid physiology, steroids and health, and steroid
use for sport or cosmetic reasons, the following references should be
of benefit. They represent a sampling of the information that's contributed
to our knowledge on steroids.
Online Articles:
Steroids and Side Effects (positive and negative):
Top
Ten T Myths by TC
T and Your
Ticker by Doug Kalman
Testosterone
Replacement by TC
Steroids
For Health 2003 by Cy Willson
Hormone
Replacement — The Fountain of Youth by Brock Strasser
Steroid Basics and Steroid Cycle Construction
Steroids
For Dummies by Cy Willson
The
Never Ending Cycle by Cy Willson
Steroids,
The New Rules by Brock Strasser
Obtaining Steroids — The "Legal" Way
Your Doctor
Your Dealer by Cy Willson
Testosterone and Environment
The Big T (Part I and
II) by John M Berardi
Books
Bhasin, S., et al. Pharmacology, Biology, and Clinical Applications
of Androgens. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, Inc. 1996.
Di Pasquale, M. Anabolic Steroid Side Effects. Warkworth Ontario: MGD
Press. 1990.
Dorfman, R.I., Shipley, R.A. Androgens: Biochemistry, Physiology and
clinical significance. New York: J Wiley, 1956: 53.
Francis, C. Speed Trap. New York: St Martins Press. 1990.
Kruskemper, H. Anabolic Steroids. New York: Academic Press. 1968.
Kerr, R. The Practical use of Anabolic Steroids with Athletes. San Gabriel,
CA. 1982.
Mainwaring, W.I.P. et al. The Mechanism of Action of Androgens. Verlag
New York, 8-10, 1977.
Nieschlag, E. and Behre, H.M. In Testosterone Action, Deficiency, and
Substitution. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1-31, 1998.
Philips, W.P. Anabolic Reference Guide. Golden, CO: Mile High. 1991.
Vida, J.A. Androgens and Anabolic Agents, Chemistry and Pharmacology.
Academic Press, Inc, New York, 77-91, 1969.
Wright, J. Anabolic Steroids and Sport 2. Natic, MA: Sports Science
Consultants, 1982.
Yen, S., Jaffe, R. Reproductive Endocrinology. Philadelphia: Saunders
Co., 1986.
Yesalis, C.E. Anabolic Steroids in Sport and Exercise. Windsor Ont.,
Human Kinetics: 2000.
Journal Articles
Alen, M. Suominen, J. Effect of androgenic and anabolic steroids on
spermatogenesis in power athletes. Int. J Sports Med. 1984: 5 (Oct): 189-92.
Alen, M. Androgenic steroid effects on liver and red cells. Br J Sports
Med. 1985: 19 (1): 15-20.
Albert, J, et al., Prostate Concentrations of endogenous androgens by
radioimmunoassay. J Steroid Biochem 7:301 (1976).
Arnold, A., Potts, G.O., & Beyler, A.l. Evaluation of the protein
anabolic properties of certain orally active anabolic agents based on
nitrogen balance studies in rats. Endocrinology. 1963. 72: 408-417.
Bergink, E.W., Janssen, P.S., Turpijn, E.W., & Van der Vies, J.
Comparison of the receptor binding properties of nandrolone and testosterone
under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry.
1985: (22): 831-836.
Bhasin, S., Woodhouse, L., Sorer, T.W. Proof of the effect of testosterone
on skeletal muscle. Journal of Endocrinology. 2001: (170): 27-38.
Bhasin, S. et al. Testosterone dose-response relationship in healthy
young men. American Journal of Physiology. 2001: vol. 281, (6): E1172-E1181.
Brodsky, I.G., Balagopal, P., & Nair, N.S. Effect of testosterone
replacement on muscle mass and protein synthesis in hypogonadal men-a
clinical research center study. Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism.
1998: (81): 3469-3475.
Catlin, D.H., & Halton, C.K. Use and abuse of anabolics and other
drugs for athletic enhancement. Advances in Internal Medicine. 1991: (36):
399-424.
Cowart, V. Steroids in sports: After four decades time to return these
genies to the bottle. JAMA. 1987: 257: 421.
Diekerman RD, McConathy WJ, Zachariah NY. Testosterone, sex hormone-binding
globulin, lipoproteins and vascular disease risk. J Cardiovasc Risk 1997
: 4(5-6):363-366.
Frankle, M.A., Eichberg, R., & Zachariah, S.B. Anabolic androgenic
steroids and a stroke in an athlete: Case report. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab.
1980: (69): 632-634.
Glazer, G. Atherogenic effects of anabolic steroids on serum lipid levels.
Arch Intern Med. 1991: (151): 1925-33.
Goldstein, P. Anabolic steroids: An ethnographic approach. NIDA Res.
Monogr. 1990: (102): 74-96.
Haupt, H., Rovere, G. Anabolic steroids: A review of the literature.
Am Journal of Sports Med. 1984: 12(6): 469-84.
Hervey, G.R. et al. Effects of methandienone on the performance and
body composition of men undergoing athletic training. Clin Sci. 1981:
60(4): 457-61.
Lamb, D.R. Anabolic steroids in athletics: How well do they work and
how dangerous are they? Am J Sports Med. 1984: 12(1): 31-38.
Marin, P., Krotkiewski, M., & Bjorntrop, P. Androgen treatment of
middle-aged obese men: effects on metabolism, muscle, and adipose tissue.
European Journal of Medicine. 1992: (1): 329-336.
Potts, G.O., Arnold, A., & Beyler, A.L. Dissociation of the androgenic
and other hormonal effects of steroids. 1976.
Sader MA, Griffiths KA, McCredie RJ, et al. Androgenic anabolic steroids
and arterial structure and function in male bodybuilders. J Am Coll Cardiol
2001;37(1):224-230.
Seidell, J., Bjorntrop, P., Sjostrom, L., Kvist, H., & Samerstedt,
A. Visceral fat accumulation in men is positively associated with insulin,
glucose and c-peptide levels, but negatively with testosterone levels.
Metabolism. 1990: (39): 897-901.
Shapiro J, Christiana J, Frishman WH. Testosterone and other anabolic
steroids as cardiovascular drugs. Am J Ther 1999;6(3):167-174.
Sitteri, PK, Wilson, JD, DHT in Prostatic Hypetrophy. J Clin Invest, 49:1737
(1970).
Snyder, P.J., et al. Effect of testosterone treatment on body composition
and muscle strength in men over 65. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology
and Metabolism. 1999: (84): 2647-2653.
Street, C., Antonio, J., & Culdip, D. Androgen use by athletes:
A reevaluation of the health risks. Can. J. Appl. Physiol. 1996: 21(6):
421-440.
Taylor, W., Black, A. Pervasive anabolic steroid use among health club
athletes. Ann Sports Med. 1987: 3(2): 155-9.
Urban, R.I. et al. Testosterone administration to elderly men increases
skeletal muscle strength and protein synthesis. American Journal of Physiology.
1995: (269): E820-E826.
Wang, C. et al. Effect of testosterone replacement therapy on mood changes
in hypogonadal men. Endo. Soc. 1995: June p2-122.
Webb, O.L., Laskarzewski, P.M., Glueck, C.J. Severe depression of high-density
lipoprotein cholesterol levels in weight lifters and body builders by
self-administered exogenous testosterone and anabolic androgenic steroids.
Metabolism. 1984: (33): 971-975.
Wilson, JD, The intranuclear metabolism of Testosterone in the accessory
organs of reproduction. Recent Prog Horm Res 26: 309 (1970)
Wilson, J.D., Griffen, J.E. The use and misuse of androgens. Metabolism.
1980: 29(12): 1278-95.
Wilson, J.D. Androgen use by athletes. Endo. Rev. 1988: (9): 181-199.
Windsor, R., Dumitru, D. Anabolic steroid use by athletes. Post Grad
Med. 1988: (84): 37-49.
Wright, J. Anabolic steroids and athletics. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1980:
(Sep): 140-202.
Wu, F.C.W. Endocrine aspects of anabolic steroids. Clinical Chemistry.
1997: (43): 1289-1292.
Yeager, D., Bamberger, M. Over the edge: Aware that drug testing is
a sham, athletes seem to rely more than ever on banned performance enhancers.
Sports Illustrated, April,14, 1997.
Yesalis, C.E., Bharke, M.S. Anabolic-androgenic steroids. Sports Med.
1995: 19(5): 326-340.
Zgliczynski S, Ossowski M, Slowinska-Srednicka J, et al. Effect of testosterone
replacement therapy on lipids and lipoproteins in hypogonadal and elderly
men. Atherosclerosis 1996;121(1):35-43.
Zmuda JM, Cauley JA, Kriska A, et al. Longitudinal relation between
endogenous testosterone and cardiovascular disease risk factors in middle
aged men. A 13 year follow-up of former Multiple Risk Factor Intervention
Trial participants. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146(8):609-617.
|
 |
 |
|
Keep up to date on all the latest at johnberardi.com.
Sign up today and get a free ebook entitled "The Essential
Berardi." |
|
 |
|
"Anyone who is searching for the right combination
to make gains both in their physique and in their strength and performance
need look no further. John Berardi is the man to take you to the
next level and beyond.”
Fritz Sorensen, California
Science Link Client
|
|
|